Strategic thinking in contests
نویسندگان
چکیده
We examine motives for ‘overbidding’ in contests between individuals using a “two-headed” approach to decision-making. In contests, subject pairs send suggested bids and messages partner. Content analysis of the provides insight into an individual’s bidding motives. addition, we elicit measures preferences, beliefs, impulsiveness. find that beliefs about others’ emphasize winning (i.e., utility winning) are most robust predictors ‘overbidding’. Our results suggest analyzing communication rich window thought process when making decisions, can complement insights from elicited values common decision tasks (Replication materials, including data, do files, software, available at https://sites.google.com/view/david-bruner/research).
منابع مشابه
Strategic Restraint in Contests
Economic policy is modeled as the outcome of a (political) game between two interest groups. The possible ex-post (realized) outcomes in the game correspond to the proposed policies. In the literature the policies fought for are exogenous. We extend such games by allowing the endogenous determination of the proposed policies. In a first stage the groups decide which policy to lobby for and then...
متن کاملStrategic Delegation and Mergers in Oligopolistic Contests
In this paper, we combine the strategic delegation approach of FershtmanJudd-Sklivas with contests. The results show that besides a symmetric equilibrium there also exist asymmetric equilibria in which one owner induces pure sales maximization to his manager so that all the other firms drop out of the market. If merging is allowed on an initial stage, the resulting merged subgame perfect equili...
متن کاملStrategic reasoning in p-beauty contests
This paper analyzes strategic choice in p-beauty contests. First, I show that it is not generally a best reply to guess the expected target value, even in games with n > 2 players, and that iterated best response sequences strictly applied do not induce a choice sequence approximating pk · 0.5. Second, I argue that the beliefs and actions of players typically considered to be level 2–4 are capt...
متن کاملWishful Thinking in Strategic Environments
Towards developing a theory of systematic biases about strategies, I analyze strategic implications of a particular bias: wishful thinking about the strategies. Considering canonical state spaces for strategic uncertainty, I identify a player as a wishful thinker at a state if she hopes to enjoy the highest payoff that is consistent with her information about the others’ strategies at that stat...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Experimental Economics
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1386-4157', '1573-6938']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-021-09735-6